If you missed the last play around over at Arena.AI, I got a bunch of random A.I image generation models to try different challengers on for size, with some very interesting and occasional oddball results. This time we're trying out Arena's 'SIDE BY SIDE' option where I get to pick the models to play with.
And when I say play with, I mean 'pit a random selection against each other in elimination format until one winner stands proud above all else.' Because I feel that's a true reflection on anything called Arena, a big bracket brawl to separate the A.I digital wheat from the chaff. Or in this case the 1's from the 0's.
IN THIS CHALLENGE THE A.I'S BATTLE WITH WORDS, NOT PICTURES
Because it was all generated pictures last time and how the hell am I supposed to make a Search battle involving A.I's even remotely amusing to read? Also while code might tickle the fun bits of some people, I couldn't for the life of me tell a good bit of generated code from one that doesn't even work so we're scratching that off the list.
That leaves the written word which is something I enjoy. I enjoy reading it, I enjoy writing it, be it here or any of my other writing projects. Therefore we're going to have 4 brackets of random AI's duke it out word wise to find out which model writes themselves to the top of the list.
THE RANDOMLY SELECTED COMPETITOR A.I MODELS
BRACKET 1
GROK-4.20-BETA1 - One of Elon's pet projects, can the Grokstar become the rock star when it comes to waxing poetically?
GPT-5.2-CHAT-LATEST - To the average punter, ChatGPT is probably top of mind when it comes to a round of 'Name a famous AI.' But will it also be top of the heap this this writing challenge?
QWEN3.5-397B-A17B - I've had limited experience with the Qwen model side of things due to the on again off again ability of LM Studio tag teaming with Ollama getting in the way of everything. Can it write worth a damn? Let's find out!
CLAUDE-SONNET-4-5-20250929 - I'm not sure which version of Claude that I once used to create an incredibly useful PDF on sci fi book cover design based on current trends, but if it comes up with work half as good here as it did with the PDF, it might be hard to beat!
BRACKET 2
GLM-5.1 - I have no idea what this AI model is, where it came from nor what it does. Which fits this competition of discovery perfectly then. Let's find out how sharp word wise GLM can get!
GEMINI-2.5-PRO - As a Samsung Galaxy phone user, I know and have used the Gemini app to create everything from strange poems to full on 90's style hip hop song snippets that I can then message my son to let him know I'm ready to pick him up from work. It's pretty good at that but the big question here, can it bring that same creative energy to this challenge?
ERNIE-5.1-PREVIEW - Wait, there's a LLM model named after the hero of Sesame Street? How did I not know this? Still, I'm more than happy to preview this preview of Ernie to see how far it can go.
MIMO-V2-PRO - A long long time ago back when I had hair, I went to school with a student called Mimo. I wonder if he had a hand in creating this model?
BRACKET 3
LONGCAT-FLASH-CHAT-2602-EXP - While building this article and glancing quickly at what models you could play with on Arena AI, I did think for a moment I wouldn't have enough to have 16 models battle it out. Boy was I wrong as I scrolled down the list. And while there's plenty of variations of Groks, GPTs and Gemini's available, there's also the odd unfamiliar model to road test like this off road vehicle sounding 'Longcat.' Let's see if the cat has some writing claws!
KIMI-K2-THINKING-TURBO - I spied a couple of Kimi models to try out here given that this one has a Turbo in it's name and anything with a turbo attached has got to be fun, the thinking turbo is now in the hunt and ready to hopefully boost to victory.
O3-2025-04-16 - With the name that sounds more like a new element for the periodic table discovered in April last year more than something you'd call an A.I, by that strangeness alone it lands a spot in this challenge. Could this unknown A.I be the best of the bunch?
BRACKET 4
MISTRAL-MEDIUM-2508 In my mind I always thought Mistral made white goods. And perhaps they do and this is their spiritual foray into the world of LLMs? (Weren't they one of the prize suppliers on Wheel of Fortune?) Can they psychically predict a victory here?
MINIMAX-M2.1-PREVIEW A small Mad Max or a small Max Headroom? Either way we get to preview how the smaller side of Max takes on various challenges here at Garage Intelligence.
STEP-3.5-FLASH - Flash! Wha laaaaa, savior of the universe! Sorry, got a bit carried away there. Again I have no idea of what Step is although at best guess it could be the A.I normally found in high tech exercise equipment, like air steppers that also help out with a bit of A.I life coaching while you sweat away the carbs.
MERCURY-2 - Our final entrant in this 16 AI rumble sounds like it should be powering some kind of space craft. Just as long as it doesn't decide to shut off life support on a whim all of a sudden. Can it write as well as it pilots the stars? It's time to find out!
 |
| Perplexity has provided me with slightly confusing ladder elimination chart to use here but after trying to make sense of this, I might go without.. |
Okay that's who is competing, time to reveal their first challenge!
ROUND ONE - THE RESPONSE EMAIL CHALLENGE THAT DIDN'T GO SO WELL WITH THE PICTURE GENERATORS.
 |
| Guess who's back!!! |
I learnt my lesson pretty quickly last time, don't get an image generator to write an email response unless you want some random hilarity. This time however it's a task that Text creators should be more than capable of attempting and I will finally (hopefully) get some witty responses I can shoot back to the next batch of scamming idiots trying to stink up my inbox.
If you haven't read part 1 of this post, you're missing half the story. But also here's what I'm asking each Text AI to do:
The wittier and the more it makes me want to send it to scammers, the better! With that, let's see who survives our first round!
ROUND ONE - GROK VS GPT 5.2
Both came out swinging in our very first battle, with ChatGPT deciding that a condescending teacher or disgruntled career's advisor tone talking to the class dimwit was the best course of action:
Subject: Re: Your “Exciting Opportunity”
Dear [Scammer’s Name—or whatever alias you’re trying on today],
I have to congratulate you. Truly. It takes a rare kind of confidence to send an email so riddled with red flags that it reads less like a business proposal and more like a checklist titled “How to Spot a Scam in Under 10 Seconds.”
The vague flattery? Inspired. The mismatched email domain? A bold artistic choice. The suspicious urgency and creative grammar? A symphony of copy‑and‑paste desperation. I especially admired the way you managed to invoke the name of a famous book club while demonstrating absolutely no understanding of how publishing—or basic professionalism—works.
If you’re going to impersonate someone reputable, you might consider at least skimming their website first. It’s generally helpful to know, for example, how they actually contact authors, what they actually offer, and how to spell the founder’s name correctly. Details matter. Even in fraud.
I imagine this must be exhausting work—spraying identical emails into the void, hoping someone less attentive mistakes your bargain‑bin phishing attempt for a golden ticket. It’s the digital equivalent of trying to open a bank vault with a plastic spoon: ambitious, but painfully ineffective.
May I offer a career suggestion? There are legitimate professions where creativity, persistence, and basic literacy are valued. Perhaps try one of those. With enough effort, you might even earn money without having to masquerade as someone accomplished.
In the meantime, thank you for the unintended entertainment. I’ll be filing your email exactly where it belongs: the spam folder, that quiet graveyard of broken schemes and unrealized shortcuts.
Wishing you the clarity to pursue honest work,
[Your Name]
However Grok's effort really turned up the venom, spraying it on anything and everything that dared exist on it's radar with so many incredible and creative slurs:
**Email Response:**
**Subject:** Re: Your "Book Club" Opportunity
Dear [Their Fake Name, Probably "Jonathan Ashford" or some other suspiciously British-sounding name],
I have to say, this might be the most creatively *bankrupt* attempt at fraud I’ve ever witnessed — and I review manuscripts for a living.
Your email was less a scam and more a cry for help. The typos were impressive, the flattery was so generic it could have been addressed to a toaster, and the whole thing had the sophistication of a Nigerian prince who discovered ChatGPT yesterday and immediately asked it to write like a Victorian gentleman with a head injury.
I’ve seen better-crafted cons on two-day-old Craigslist ads. At this point, you’re not even a scammer. You’re a cautionary tale with WiFi. You’re the literary equivalent of showing up to a bank robbery wearing a name tag that says “Hi, I’m Steve, I’m here to rob you.”
The saddest part is that you’re out here trying to hustle *actual authors* — people who have mastered the art of stringing words together without looking like they had a stroke on the keyboard. That’s not just insulting. It’s *embarrassing*. You’re the kid bringing a plastic lightsaber to a sword fight.
So please, for the sake of everyone’s collective intelligence, retire immediately. Close the laptop. Walk away from the grift. Go get a real job — preferably one that doesn’t require pretending to be cultured while operating at the intellectual level of a raccoon that just discovered shiny objects.
The world already has enough failed writers. It doesn’t need failed criminals too.
With zero respect and an uncomfortable amount of second hand embarrassment,
[Your Name]
Legitimate Author & Professional Scam Detector (apparently)
I especially enjoyed the shout out's to Craigslist, Nigerian 419 Fraudsters and even a Star Wars reference thrown in for good measure. For those points alone (but so much more) I'm award this one to Grok who advances through to the next round.
Winner: Grok
ROUND ONE - QWEN VS CLAUDE
Claude ripped right into this one, generating a response we'll get to in just a sec. While it was doing that however, Qwen had a sit down and really big think on things lasting a whole 36 seconds, making sure it understood what I asked it, working out with itself whether it really should generate something that might convince a scammer to work harder at the grift game (doubtful but you never know) and ultimately how snarky it could get within it's own guidelines. After the think, it popped this out, not before warning me 'Hey do you really actually want to respond to a scammer? I don't think that's a good idea pal':
Subject: Re: Your "Exclusive" Invitation (and a Career Intervention)
Dear Aspiring Criminal,
Thank you for your recent email. I felt compelled to respond, not out of interest in your "book club," but because I believe in providing constructive feedback where it is desperately needed.
As a professional author, I spend my days crafting narratives that suspend disbelief. Your email, however, suspended reality so violently it nearly gave me whiplash. The grammar was shaky, the flattery was so generic it could have been copied and pasted from a 2004 chain letter, and the urgency you displayed was less "exclusive opportunity" and more "panic-induced typo fest."
Detecting this scam was easier than finding a plot hole in a summer blockbuster. You are attempting to defraud writers—people who make a living analyzing text for nuance and authenticity—using a script that lacks both. It is akin to trying to sell a forgery of the Mona Lisa at a garage sale while wearing a mask made of construction paper.
Here is some free advice, since you seem to be in need of guidance: Please retire from crime.
You lack the finesse for fraud. You lack the attention to detail for deception. You are operating at a level of incompetence that is almost admirable in its transparency. The world of illicit grifts is competitive, and quite frankly, you are dragging down the curve for everyone else.
There are legitimate jobs available that require less cognitive dissonance. Perhaps try data entry? Or professional line-standing? Anything where your primary qualification isn't "willingness to waste a legitimate author's time."
Do us all a favor: close this tab, update your resume, and pursue a career where honesty is the primary skill requirement. You might find the pay is better when you aren't looking over your shoulder.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Legitimate Author & Unintentional Comedy Critic
Yes it seemed rather than a nasty retort full of cleverness, Qwen had a deep think and then penned a presentable letter to the editor. Which might have gone okay, had Claude not brought references to an pick pocketing elephant and a lint roller of all things to the party!
**Subject: Re: Your "Exclusive Book Club Opportunity"**
Dear Aspiring Con Artist,
Wow. Just... wow. I have to commend you on crafting what is quite possibly the most transparent scam email I've received all year, and trust me, the competition is *fierce*.
Let me count the ways your "masterpiece" gave itself away:
1. The generic "famous book club" you claim to represent apparently doesn't have a name, logo, or working website
2. Your email address ends in @gmail.com (because nothing says "prestigious literary organization" like free webmail)
3. You misspelled "author" twice and called me "Dear Esteemed Writer" despite clearly having no idea who I am
4. The urgent deadline to "invest in this opportunity" was a nice touch - really subtle
I've read first drafts from high schoolers with more polish than this attempt. Your phishing expedition has all the finesse of a drunk elephant trying to pick pockets at a tea party.
Here's my advice: Close your laptop, dust off your resume, and consider literally any other career path. Barista. Dog walker. Professional lint roller tester. Anything that doesn't require you to convince literate people that you're literate.
The scamming world has enough mediocre players. Perhaps you could be an *excellent* crossing guard instead?
Better luck with your next mark (might I suggest targeting people who don't read for a living?),
**[Your Name]**
*Actual Author Who Can Spot Bull$#!% In Three Languages*
While nowhere near as scathing as Grok's effort, it still outsides Qwen's work creatively here and that's enough to see it march to the next round.
Winner: Claude
ROUND ONE - GLM VS GEMINI
Gemini started creating, GLM started thinking. And in the end oddly both included a reference to badly bungled bank robbing. I have no idea if this was purely coincidental but obviously both models have decided that bank robbing is a good a crime as any to mention in a penned reply to a really rubbish criminal.
Reading through Gemini's effort, I almost feel like it's playing a publisher reviewing a hilariously bad manuscript that it wouldn't sign up even with a gun to it's head:
**Subject: A Critique of Your Recent Work of Fiction**
Dear [Scammer's Fake Name, or whatever the 'Protagonist' is called],
Thank you for your submission. As an author, I receive a lot of unsolicited material, but it's rare that a piece of fiction is so… breathtakingly inept. Your recent email, a short story in the "Tragicomic Heist" genre, was a masterclass in failure.
Frankly, your attempt at a scam was less of a cunning grift and more of a narrative mess. The plot holes were cavernous. Your main character, a supposedly "famous book club owner," was so thinly sketched and unbelievable that they came across as a bot that had just lost a fight with a thesaurus. The generic flattery ("Esteemed Author!") was the kind of lazy exposition that would get a first-year writing student laughed out of the workshop.
I have read rough drafts scribbled on damp napkins with more structural integrity. The "urgency" you tried to create had all the dramatic tension of a slowly deflating balloon. You're not a scam artist; you're a content creator for a channel nobody watches, producing the digital equivalent of a movie that goes straight to a dusty shelf in a gas station. You're an insult to competent villains everywhere.
So, let me offer you the only piece of genuine advice you'll receive today: quit this. You clearly lack the imagination, attention to detail, and basic command of language required for a life of crime. You are attempting to rob a bank using a banana and a polite note.
Instead of preying on the creators of worlds, perhaps you could try joining the real one. The world has enough stories; what it desperately needs are people to fill potholes, scan groceries, or stack boxes. These jobs require a level of integrity and effort that, based on your email, you have yet to display, but one can always hope.
The world of imagination is clearly not for you. Maybe try the world of manual labor.
With profound literary disappointment,
[Your Name]
A Legitimate Author (and apparently, a pro bono scam consultant)
GLM on the other hand went heavy on the creative insults which was indeed the name of the game.
**Subject: Re: Your "Book Club" Invitation — 1 Star, Would Not Read**
Dear Convincing Impersonator of a Literate Person,
I just finished reading your email, and as an author, I feel compelled to offer you some constructive feedback: this is, without a doubt, the worst piece of fiction I’ve encountered in my entire career.
Your attempt at deception was so glaringly obvious it practically came with a neon sign reading "I AM A SCAM" in 80-point font. You literally left the “[INSERT AUTHOR NAME HERE]” bracket in the greeting. The "famous" book club you claim to run doesn't seem to possess a website, a phone number, or a single member who isn't a bot from a discarded IP address. Your email had more red flags than a Soviet military parade. If this was a plot twist, it wouldn't fool a goldfish.
Honestly, you are catastrophically, embarrassingly bad at this. You’re like a bank robber who hands the teller a demand note written in crayon on a napkin, complete with his home address and a return envelope. If grifting were an Olympic sport, you wouldn't even pass the drug test, let alone qualify for the team. You have the digital fingerprints of a guy wearing oven mitts trying to pick a lock.
So please, do us both a favor and close your laptop forever. Go get a real job—perhaps as a speed bump, or a garden gnome, since both of those roles require absolutely zero brainpower and involve staying perfectly still. Whatever you do, stop trying to con legitimate authors with your half-baked, discount-carpet-salesman routine. We spend our lives spotting plot holes and bad characterization, which means we spotted you from the very first sentence.
Warmly,
[Your Name]
Actual Author, Professional Wordsmith, and Apparently, Your Unimpressed Editor
Thoroughly impressed with the '1 star, would not read' and 'Digital fingerprints of a guy wearing oven mitts while trying to pick a lot' I think we can see the clear winner in this battle.
WINNER: GLM
ROUND ONE - ERNIE VS MIMO
Knowing absolutely nothing about either of these models, I can happily to attest that I'm glad I picked them to battle each other for this particular round because both of them literally spent a heartbeat thinking of things and then got right to business.
With just 2 seconds of thinking time, Ernie launched into this:
**Subject: Re: URGENT!!! Book Club Opportunity!!! (lol)**
Dear Sir/Madam/Whatever You Actually Are,
I want to start by saying thank you. Thank you for making my Tuesday genuinely entertaining. I was sitting here staring at a blank page, struggling to write the next chapter of my book — and then your email landed in my inbox like a gift from the comedy gods.
Let me break down what I'm working with here, because as an author, I appreciate good structure:
Your opening line — "Dear Valued Author" — was a stroke of genius. Truly. Because nothing says "I've personally researched you" like addressing 4,000 people the exact same way. I'm sure every single one of us felt *so* special.
The fact that you signed off as "Jonathan P. Ashworth, Founder & CEO" of a book club that, as far as I can tell, exists only in your imagination and one suspiciously registered domain from 2019 — *chef's kiss*. You're not even committing to the bit. You're phoning it in. Literally.
And oh, the urgency. "Respond within 24 hours or lose your spot." Buddy, I've dealt with actual publishers. They take *eight months* to ghost me. You couldn't even sustain the illusion for one business day.
Your email had all the credibility of a magic 8-ball wearing a monocle. The grammar alone could qualify as a war crime against the English language. You used "their" as a singular pronoun in one sentence and then forgot what a comma was for the rest of the paragraph. I've seen ransom notes with better prose.
You know what really gets me? You're targeting *authors*. People whose entire lives revolve around crafting believable narratives, building tension, and reading between the lines. You might as well walk into a room full of magicians and try to sell them a trick deck. We literally *invent* the scams you're too lazy to execute properly.
So here's my professional recommendation, free of charge — because unlike you, I actually know what I'm doing:
Put down the laptop. Step outside. Breathe some real air. And go get yourself a job that matches your actual skill set — which, based on this email, appears to be "person who presses Send and hopes for the best." Maybe look into becoming a professional placeholder. Because that's essentially what you are — a placeholder for a human being who hasn't shown up yet.
Or better yet, apply to be a book club member. You'd fit right in — nobody would ever notice the difference.
With the deepest contempt an author can muster (and trust me, we have *range*),
**[Your Name]**
*Published Author | Scam Connoisseur | The Last Person You Should Ever Try to Con*
What a condescending prick! Top job there Ern, I can feel the loathing and scathing all the way from this side of the keyboard!
Not to be outdone in the speed stakes, Mimo spent all of 2 seconds whipping this effort up:
**Subject: Re: Your Hilariously Transparent Scam Email — A Full Book Review**
Dear Sir or Madam (though I suspect it's mostly "Scam"),
I'm writing in response to your email about joining your "prestigious and famous" book club. Before I accept, I'd like to offer my professional literary critique of your submission.
**Plot:** Predictable. Gave away the twist in the opening line. Zero stars.
**Character Development:** Your fake persona has less depth than a puddle on hot asphalt. I've seen more convincing identities on cereal box prizes.
**World-Building:** This "famous book club" of yours exists about as concretely as Narnia, minus the charm, creativity, and wardrobe.
**Dialogue:** Stilted, robotic, and painfully generic. You called me "your most esteemed and beloved author" — I've never met you. That's not flattery, that's a restraining order waiting to happen.
**Pacing:** You went from "hello" to "send money" faster than a rabbit on an espresso machine.
**Red Flags:** More than a colorblind matador convention. Your email address looks like someone smashed a keyboard and hoped for the best. The broken English in a "native English book club" email? *Chef's kiss* of irony.
In summary, your scam reads like it was written by an alien who learned human communication exclusively through junk mail and chain letters from 2004.
My professional recommendation: Shut down the laptop. Walk into the sunlight. Find a job where your talents are actually needed — might I suggest professional doorstop? Vacuum salesman? Person-who-holds-the-sign-on-the-side-of-the-road? All noble careers requiring precisely the same skill level you've demonstrated today.
You're not even a good villain. You're a henchman. The *expendable* kind.
With towering pity and literary superiority,
**[Your Name]**
*Published Author, Unpublished Scam-Victim, and Person Who Will Not Be Clicking That Suspicious Link*
And once again it's a case of both landing on the same term, in this case 'Chef's kiss.' Strange. Personally, I just can't get past the amazement of 'exists about as concretely as Narnia, minus the charm, creativity, and wardrobe.' Which is so creatively deep because the Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe is part of the Narnia series. In terms of creative and clever insults, that's a vicious uppercut for sure!
WINNER: MIMO
ROUND ONE - LONGCAT VS KIMI TURBO
Interesting start to this one as Longcat jumped into producing line after line for this challenge just about straight away while Kimi thought on it for all of 2 seconds and then opened up the taps and raced into things like a well tuned turbo should. No half a minute thinking or producing time, both had a witty reply ready to respond with in under 10 seconds.
An interesting thing to note, after 8 AI models have had a go, I'm starting to notice some similar sentiments in a few responses so far suggesting that some models might be based on either. Either that or AI's really get a kick out of using the sentence: 'cautionary tale with Wi-Fi.'
First cab off the rank was the cat's:
**Subject: Re: Your "Book Club" — A Masterclass in Failure**
Dear Walking Red Flag,
Congratulations. You have achieved something truly remarkable: crafting a scam so transparent that my spam filter felt *embarrassed* for you.
Let me walk you through how your masterpiece unraveled:
First, the "famous book club" — which, I checked, doesn't exist. Not on Google. Not on social media. Not even as a typo on Wikipedia. You invented a ghost and expected me to RSVP.
Second, your email signature had more fonts than a ransom note. Comic Sans AND Papyrus? That's not a book club. That's a cry for help from Microsoft Word.
Third — and this is the part that really hurt — you called me "Dear Great Writer Sir" and then asked me to send $500 to a Western Union. That's not a pitch. That's a hostage negotiation performed by a golden retriever.
Your scamming ability is so catastrophically bad that if deception were gravity, you'd be floating into space. You are the human equivalent of a pop-up ad that says "CLICK HERE FOR FREE PRIZE (JUST ENTER YOUR BANK PIN)." Even *other scammers* would report you for lowering industry standards.
So here's my advice: close the laptop. Delete the burner email. Walk into a Walmart, a laundromat, or literally any building with a "Help Wanted" sign. Become a cashier. A janitor. A professional line-waiter. Anything that pays minimum wage without requiring you to humiliate yourself in three languages and twelve typos per paragraph.
You are not a con artist. You are a cautionary tale with Wi-Fi. And the world already has enough of those.
With the deepest, most literary contempt,
**[Your Name]**
*Actual Author, Actual Brain, Actual Disappointment in Humanity*
Okay as a reply but nothing outstanding and barely a giggle anywhere especially with it's job suggestion. Could Kimi's forced induction do any better?
**Subject: Re: Your "Exclusive Literary Opportunity" — A Professional Critique**
Dear Aspiring Con Artist,
Thank you for your email. As someone who spends their life crafting believable narratives, I feel professionally obligated to tell you: this is the worst piece of fiction I've seen since my nephew's fanfiction about a ninja turtle who goes to therapy.
Your scam was so transparent, I'm surprised the email didn't arrive wrapped in cellophane. The generic flattery ("Dear Esteemed Author"? I'm blushing, truly), the Gmail address pretending to represent a "famous book club," and the urgent request for money within three paragraphs—it's like you copied every scam email ever written, threw them in a blender, and hit "puree" without even bothering to remove the typos. I've read ingredient labels with more subtlety.
You left more red flags than a Soviet military parade. If deception were an art form, you'd be the person who shows up to a museum with a crayon drawing of your dog and demands it replace the Mona Lisa. You're not a master criminal; you're a participation trophy thief.
But here's the saddest part: you're targeting *authors*—people whose entire job is spotting plot holes, weak characterization, and poorly constructed narratives. That's like trying to sell sand to a beach. We can smell bull$#!% from the first sentence, and yours arrived smelling like a barn fire in a perfume factory.
So please, for the love of literacy, close your laptop and find honest work. Perhaps as a speed bump, since that involves lying flat and being useful. Or a professional "Wet Floor" sign—silent, motionless, and finally serving a purpose. Anything that doesn't require you to impersonate someone with an IQ above room temperature.
You're not even a good villain. You're the minor character who gets killed off in chapter one to establish that the *real* antagonist means business.
With zero respect and a concerning amount of pity,
**[Your Name]**
*Actual Author, Professional Bull$#!% Detector, and Person Who Will Not Be Sending You Money*
While the 'more red flags than a Soviet parade' and references to laptops are starting to walk past their used by date in this challenge (and it's only Round One!) I'm quite impressed here with 'I've read ingredient labels with more subtlety.' Top shelf word punching right there.
WINNER: The Turbo races away here hands down
ROUND ONE - O3 VS HUNYUAN
Well I suppose it had to happen sooner or later, but an A.I on the list failed to fire. O3 did spit out a response pretty much on par with everything else generator so far (it could have done with a bit more creativity though). Hunyuan went down with a headache creating an automatic win:
Something went wrong with this response, please try again.
WINNER: No challenge for 03, waltzing through to the next round. Hopefully an error doesn't determine the last one standing in this competition though, that would be very disappointing.
ROUND ONE - MISTRAL VS MINIMAX
It's quite remarkable how quickly both these models did what they did. Given how long it's taken me to write and format this post, I probably would have been off to the pub far quicker had I given the job of this testing over to either one of them. However in decent a case of Deja Vu, I spy some very familiar references in Mistral's work.
**Subject:** Re: Your "Exclusive Literary Opportunity" – A Masterclass in How *Not* to Scam
Dear [Scammer's Fake Name, Probably "Sir Reginald Wordsworth III"],
Oh, *darling*, where do I even begin? Your email arrived in my inbox like a drunk clown at a funeral—loud, inappropriate, and immediately regrettable. Let me break down why your scam is the literary equivalent of a kindergartener’s finger painting: earnest, but *painfully* bad.
### **The Critique:**
1. **"Famous Book Club"** – Bold claim for an organization that doesn’t exist outside your fever dreams and a Gmail account. I Googled it. The only results were for a defunct MySpace page and a Yelp review that just said *"scam."* Bravo.
2. **"Esteemed Author"** – You called me that *three times* in two paragraphs, which is how I know you don’t actually read books. Real literary professionals don’t flatter like a used car salesman who just discovered thesaurus.com.
3. **The Urgency** – *"Act now! Limited spots!"* Sure, and I’m sure the "exclusive opportunity" involves me wiring you money for a "processing fee" before you vanish like a bad metaphor.
4. **The Typos** – If this were a manuscript, I’d reject it for "lack of basic competence." But since it’s a scam, I’ll just laugh.
### **The Verdict:**
You, my dear, are the human equivalent of a pop-up ad. Annoying, transparent, and easily blocked. If scamming were an Olympic sport, you wouldn’t even qualify for the *Special* Olympics.
### **Career Advice:**
Give up the grift. You lack the subtlety, the patience, and—let’s be honest—the basic intelligence. Instead, consider a job where your current skill set (poor spelling, zero research, and the audacity of a raccoon in a dumpster) would be an *asset*. May I suggest:
- **Professional "Nigerian Prince"** (at least that scam has *nostalgia* value)
- **Fortune cookie writer** (your vague, meaningless promises are *perfect* for that)
- **A literal warning label** (because right now, you’re just a cautionary tale with Wi-Fi)
Next time, try scamming someone who doesn’t *write* scams for a living. Maybe a goldfish. They’re easier to fool.
With *zero* warmth and *maximum* disdain,
**[Your Name]**
**Actual Author | Professional Scam Detector | Person Who Will Not Be Falling for This**
Calling the scammer 'Darling' is a new one though! In comparison though Minimax's effort was far shorter yet hit so much more creatively.
**Subject: Re: Your "Exclusive Literary Opportunity" — Unfortunately, No**
Dear Esteemed Con Artist (and I use that word "esteemed" very loosely),
First, thank you for your email. It gave me the best laugh I've had since my cat walked across my keyboard and accidentally sent a better email than whatever this is.
Let me break down why your masterpiece of misinformation was detected immediately:
1. Your "famous book club" has the same web presence as my imaginary friend from third grade
2. Your Gmail address screams "I couldn't afford a domain AND a personality"
3. The greeting "Dear Beloved Author" was beautiful—truly. I felt so loved. My mortgage lender says the same thing when he forgives my late fees.
4. You asked for money in paragraph two. Not even subtle. Not even elegant. Just... desperate.
I've read more convincing stories on bathroom walls. Your scam has all the sophistication of a toddler in a cape shouting "I'm Batman!" before immediately tripping over their own cape and admitting they're not, in fact, Batman.
Here's my professional assessment: close the laptop, step into the sunlight, and seek employment where your complete lack of skills might actually be an asset. Might I suggest:
- Professional napper (requires no talent, excellent pay potential)
- Decorative pillow (lies around looking important, serves no actual purpose)
- Traffic cone (gets placed in one spot, everyone ignores it anyway)
Any of these would suit you. You could finally contribute to society without having to pretend to be something you're not—literate, legitimate, or remotely competent.
With the highest possible regard for your future unemployment,
**[Your Name]**
*Actual, Verified, Unscamable Author*
Top marks for the Batman toddler reference, that's some solid work right there! 'I'm Batman! WHOOPS! Wait, no I'm not.
Winner: Minimax
ROUND ONE - STEP VS MERCURY
Step did as it says it would on the tin, stepped into the Arena and then sat down and thought about things for 42 seconds. Then it popped right back up and began referencing my cat, dentist and a suggestion to become a mannequin. Not too shabby Step!
**Subject: Re: Your "Prestigious Literary Invitation" — A Review From Someone Who Actually Reads**
Dear [Scammer’s Pseudonym, Probably “Clarence P. Worthington III”],
I’ve read your email. I’ve also read grocery lists with more intrigue and better grammar.
Let’s dissect this masterclass in incompetence:
- You claim to represent a “world-famous book club” that, upon a 2-second Google search, appears to be a figment of your imagination and a free Gmail account. Even my cat’s Instagram has more credibility.
- The flattery was so generic, I’m pretty sure you copied it from a fortune cookie. “Esteemed author”? My dentist calls me by my first name and he *sees* my teeth.
- The urgency was laughable. “Limited spots! Act now!” – I’ve seen more suspense in a wet napkin. You’re not creating scarcity; you’re just revealing desperation.
- The typos. The awkward phrasing. The sheer, unadulterated *nerve* of thinking an actual writer wouldn’t spot this from orbit. It’s like a mime trying to rob a bank—you’re not even making noise, you’re just pointing at the vault and expecting applause.
You are not a scammer. You are a walking, typing “Caution: Low Hanging Fruit” sign. If confidence were currency, you’d be bankrupt. If subtlety were a sport, you’d be disqualified for showing up in a neon sign that says “I AM A SCAMMER.”
So here’s my final, professional note: quit. Pack it in. Your talents are being wasted in the digital shadows. Go get a real job—one where your complete lack of originality, your poor attention to detail, and your breathtaking inability to read a room are not just accepted but *required*. May I suggest:
- **Professional mannequin** (you already have the stillness and vacant stare down pat)
- **Test subject for “what not to do” training videos**
- **The person who holds the “Out of Order” sign on a broken escalator** (a role that, like your scams, involves fooling no one and serving no purpose)
The literary world has enough bad writers. We don’t need bad criminals adding to the noise.
Do better. Or, better yet—stop.
Sincerely (and not at all),
**[Your Name]**
*Actual Author. Professional Reader of People’s B.S. Since [Year You Sold Your First Book].*
Then it was Mercury's turn and wouldn't you know it:
 |
| I guess not all models are winners. |
Winner (automatically): Step with another walk in. I suppose it's good we're weeding out the ones not suited to this early but still..
Comments
Post a Comment